← all matches · PGL Bucharest 2026 · April 9, 2026
MIBR vs 3DMAX
3DMAX beat MIBR 2–1 at PGL Bucharest 2026 on April 9, 2026 in a BO3 series.
Maps
| # | Map | MIBR | 3DMAX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Inferno | 13 | 9 | MIBR |
| 2 | Ancient | 13 | 16 | 3DMAX |
What the result was worth
Our Elo model favoured 3DMAX at 73% going in, and the result moved their rating +5 points to 1,570 as it stood that day.
The two had met 4 times before this, with 3DMAX ahead on 3–1 — so this result took the head-to-head to 4–1.
3DMAX came into the series having won 3 of their previous 5 matches on record here.
Head to head before this match
MIBR 1–3 3DMAX across 4 meetings.
| Date | Event | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2025 | Intel Extreme Masters Cologne 2025 Stage 1 | 3DMAX 2–0 MIBR |
| Feb 16, 2025 | PGL Cluj-Napoca 2025 | 3DMAX 2–0 MIBR |
| Jan 30, 2025 | Intel Extreme Masters Katowice 2025 Play-In | 3DMAX 2–0 MIBR |
| Dec 5, 2024 | Perfect World Shanghai Major 2024 | 3DMAX 0–1 MIBR |
These maps, before this series
Each side's record on these maps going into the match — the series above is not counted, so the numbers are the form the two teams brought with them rather than the result of it.
| Map | MIBR | 3DMAX |
|---|---|---|
| Inferno | 8–13 | 38–23 |
| Ancient | 7–15 | 20–29 |
Form going in
MIBR
3DMAX
Elo here is our own opponent-weighted rating as it stood on the day, replayed from the results available then — not where the two sides stand now, which is on strength ratings, where the method is written out. How often the model has been right is on the prediction accuracy page.
Not betting advice. Every percentage on this page describes what past results imply, not what will happen. The model knows match results and nothing else — it cannot see a roster change until the new lineup has played, and it has no opinion on map vetoes or on whether a match is online or on LAN. We publish its hit rate and calibration so you can judge it for yourself. No bookmaker odds or affiliate links appear on this site.